Okay, help me understand something here.
I have a Flickr account. The badge is on the sidebar there, as you can see.
I was looking at the stats today, and noticed a theme.
Let's look at two photos as an example.
This photo has 20+ views:
This photo has no views:
Now, I'm not fishing for compliments here, but I know how good I do and don't look.
And Mount Solitary in the Jamison Valley in New South Wales looks a hell of a lot better than I do.
And, not blowing my own trumpet, but that photo of the Jamison Valley isn't too bad. And that photo of me is fuzzy. And I look terribly emo, focussing on the camera-steadying almost to the point of a pout-of-concentration.
So, do people find photos of people - regardless of quality - more interesting than good photos of places of natural beauty?
And if so, why?
3 days ago